Trees Are A Great Starting Point, But Not Enough

Image for post
Image for post

Direct air capture, what is it good for? Why innovate when we already have technology that works?

The American Association for the Advancement of Science suggests that planting 1 trillion trees could have a massive effect on climate change. At the beginning of 2020, the Trump administration announced that the US will join, which is an effort to plant and conserve 1 trillion trees by 2030.

In the US alone, there are 20 million of acres of land in need of reforestation. We would need to build new nurseries to plant roughly 6 billion trees. In this process, hundreds of thousands of jobs would be created. The National Alliance of Forest Owners released a report in 2019 that shows that 2.5 million people work in the forest sector, which accounts for 1.5% of US GDP.

However, a study published in Science Magazine brings to light the risks to rely on trees for long-term carbon storage. Even though forests can store large amount of carbon, trees are vulnerable to drought, wildfires, and disease, which have higher consequences due to the current climate crisis. The extreme case is that if global warming continues, forests could contribute to the problem, rather than be a solution.

It is clear that reforestation is not the only solution to mitigate climate change via direct air capture. For as much carbon trees store, there is the risk of natural disaster. Other direct air capture technologies are necessary, as well as other solutions that address the climate crisis. We will also need to implement policy changes, including decreasing the use of fossil fuels.

This story has been featured in The Impact, an email newsletter that covers the latest news in the renewables and cleantech space. Check it out and subscribe here.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store